Overview

Timeframe

Role

Team

Tools

May 2022 - Aug 2022

UX Designer/Researcher

Esha Saini

Figma, React JS, Ant Design, Hand Sketching

Background

Currently, Home Depot’s Inventory Planning and Replenishment (IPR) sector is heavily reliant on the Containerization Tool through which IPR Analysts communicate with oversea vendors. Analysts place suggested order quantities (SOQs) which vendors approve, modify, and “containerize.” After orders are containerized into shipping containers for maximum efficiency, they are shipped back to the US for store distribution. However, this tool has not been updated since 2001 making it very difficult and inefficient to use.

How can the experience of reviewing SOQs and communicating with Oversea Vendors be made more efficient for IPR Analysts?

Gabriel Suniura

Stephen Johnson

Process

Research

Design

Assess

1

Existing Tool Analysis

User Interviews

Redesign Brainstorming

Hand Sketching

Wireframes

Figma Prototype

Usability Testing

Final Presentation

Prospective Improvement

User Feedback Sessions

Problem Synthesis

Requirements Gathering

3

2

Research

For the research phase of my project, the primary focus revolved around understanding what was truly wrong with the legacy application. By talking to numerous IPR analysts about how they interact with the tool on a daily basis, I could more easily pinpoint patterns that needed to be addressed in the redesign. This requirements gathering portion of the project timeline was crucial due to the app being so old that there were very few individuals who even understood it.

I spoke with 4 IPR analysts with varying levels of experience in the IPR space and the tool itself.

Based on notes I took on each interview, I was able to condense the contents of each interview into 3 main “pain points.” These pain points were then organized in order of highest to lowest priority based on the number of times they were mentioned during the interview process.

First and foremost, a deep dive of the currently application was necessary in order to understand the interface from a user perspective. The application itself was quite dated and its functionality was lacking heavily in terms of runtime and straightforwardness.

Existing Tool Analysis

Problem Synthesis

User Interviews

Design

The design phase began after all the necessary requirements were understood. Based off the pain points that were gathered and prioritized in the research phase, I began to brainstorm specific features that would address the issues. Each pain point, was given a means to fix the issue from a design perspective. From this, initial sketches and gray box wireframes were created and refined in order to produce the final redesign of the application.

Redesign Brainstorming

Hand Sketching

Graybox Wireframe

Figma Prototype

Assess

After rounds of design work in order to create a final redesign I was proud of, it was time to turn the design back around to the users in order to gain valuable feedback. I presented the redesign to the same analysts I initially interviewed and had them conduct a walkthrough of the application with no assistance at first. This helped me understand how intuitive the design was and if there were certain features that needed more clarification. Following these final tweaks made to the redesign, I along with my team, presented the fully developed revamp to the entire EUX department and Senior Leadership Team at The Home Depot.

Final Presentation